<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reading List</title>
    <link>https://reading-list.oddship.net</link>
    <description>A curated linklog of essays, posts, papers, and notes.</description>
    <atom:link href="https://reading-list.oddship.net/tags/ethics/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    
      <item>
        <title>Jev meets the trolley problem</title>
        <link>https://reading-list.oddship.net/notes/2026-10-16-jev-meets-the-trolley-problem/</link>
        <guid>https://reading-list.oddship.net/notes/2026-10-16-jev-meets-the-trolley-problem/</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 13:11:00 +0530</pubDate>
        <description>Logged at IST: 2026-10-16 13:11 IST
What it is: Zach Landes&amp;amp;#x27;s interactive comparison of Jev, OpenAI&amp;amp;#x27;s Decisions API (GPT-6 Luna), and twelve local decision models on trolley-problem scenarios.
Gist: Across 5,240 setups, the experiment varies scenario, wording, description order, and crowd size. Most models pull the lever to save five people at the cost of one, but choices shift in variants involving a model&amp;amp;#x27;s own server or developer, and as the number of people changes. The results are a useful reminder that a decision model&amp;amp;#x27;s probability is not a measure of moral correctness; some repeated ru…</description>
      </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
